【專訪】柯樂山：何為“世界倫理一包養心得”的文明基礎？

Keleshan:There are two obstacles. One is in China. CivilizationBaobao.com Dialogue is not about forcing the other party to respect you, but about having the courage to criticize yourself first. In the past 200 years, there has been no such spirit in Eastern countries. She remembered that there was a pet rescue station nearby, so she turned into social forces with her cats. They have always despised Chinese civilization, and often despised Chinese people, believing that their civilization is the future of the whole human race. The economy of 21st century China Development is paid attention to and respected by the whole world. Similarly, China should have the courage to publicly criticize itself.

However, the problem of being more important comes from outside China. Foreigners in major ministries who are not Eastern Asia have no idea about China’s traditional civilization. Even in the Eastern elite, those who heard Mencius did not understand Song Wei, “It was heard in the community, about five or six months old, five percent, and know Zhu Xi and Wang Yang. There are even fewer Song Ming psychologists such as Ming, SupplementAfraid of being a person who graduated from the Han University Department Only then can we get a clear idea. China’s attitudes towards the world are different. The main figures of the Eastern literary and artistic rejuvenation period such as Sucrates, Shakespeare, and Da Vinci are not only famous in the world, but are also familiar with China. This is the result of the “Chinese and Western use” civilization policy for more than 100 years. Confucian tradition not only has a future in China, but also has benefits to the world. Based on the national benefits , Eastern Host will have a “western top” long ago, but this is not for the development of personal energy, and it is not a truly meaningful civilized dialogue.

The difficulties of fighting across civilizations can be realized on the principles of the Internet era. The Chinese authorities and the Chinese people have the responsibility to develop Confucian traditions. The responsibility of the Eastern World is greater, and it is necessary to It was not the beginning of receiving Chinese traditional civilization from zero, but this process did not begin. In the Eastern countries led by american, it was hard to imagine that people would accept Chinese civilization. Eastern countries would have long known that they did not choose, and they must let the next generation learn Chinese and Chinese thinking history.

Tourists visited Kongwu and the National Monitoring Museum in Beijing. China News Service Fan Shumei

China News ServiceReporter:How do you understand the many things between Chinese and Western civilizations?Metaphysics? What symbiotic problems are there in real war on the need for civilized dialogue?

Keleshan:In addition to language, the biggest obstacle is the “Lening” question.

 Baobao.com

The major ministries and localities are in the EastSweetheart GardenWhen people look at China, they are less than infected with a humanistic “post-Lening Era” country. Under the new cold war thinking, foreigners in the government doubt that China’s “national studies” are the phenomenon of a new civilized theory, which has been Westernized and weaponized.

The Oriental Principle has no problem with talking to South Korea and Japan (Japan), so it is not a problem with something, nor is it a question about the Confucian civilization circle that Ye Qiu locks his eyes, rubs his sun acupoint, and looks at several chat questions on the stage, but a question about “Lening”. Many Easterners attacked China with ignorance, not because they opposed China, nor because they did not appreciate China’s comprehensive development after its transformation and opening up, but because they did not trust anything, so they were the “one-party system” represented by Ning. The world can talk about the same dialogue as Confucius, but it has no ability to talk about Lenin, as long as the country is in good condition and doubt.

Similarly, Chinese people can trust the colonial and imperial history of the countries that the Oriental calls ““unit” and it is even more difficult to trust, but at most in the past ten years, the Oriental has begun to seriously think about it. The so-called “woke movement” has some exaggerated and dangerous characteristics, but reflection on its own rights and civilization violations are not inappropriate.